Place your order

Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.

Proceed with the payment

Choose the payment system that suits you most.

Receive the final file

Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you

Paper should be an analysis of the use of historical analogy in the cyber warfar

AMAIZING OFFER GET 25% OFF YOUR FIRST ORDER CODE FIRST25

Paper should be an analysis of the use of historical analogy in the cyber warfare domain by U.S. policymakers. Broad argument should be that analogy to past ‘real-world historical events’ has been limiting for U.S. policymakers. Argument should make specific reference to the ‘Cyber Pearl Harbor’ and ‘Cyber Blitzkrieg’ metaphors as well as the three following cyber attacks: – Stuxnet Attack on Iranian Nuclear Facility (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuxnet) – Equifax Data Breach (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Equifax_data_breach) – 2016 Russian Influence on U.S. Elections (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_interference_in_the_2016_United_States_elections) – Any further attacks by Advanced Persistent Threats as required. The prof likes talking ab China a lot. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_persistent_threat) Analysis should proceed by referencing Khong’s Analogical Explanation (AE) framework: (https://saass.fandom.com/wiki/Khong,_Analogies_at_War_(XXI)) From his book, Analogies at War (https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691025353/analogies-at-war) Here are two good references for starting points: Cyber Metaphor and ‘Flatland’: (https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1045&context=mca) Analysis of Cyber Pearl Harbor metaphor: (https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/9623/7736)