AMAIZING OFFER GET 25% OFF YOUR FIRST ORDER CODE FIRST25
I’m working on a Law question and need guidance to help me study.Each week you will submit a response post of approximately 300-500 words engaging with the entire week’s assigned readings. These posts are an exercise in identifying your own questions and attempting to answer them. Each post should include at least 2-3 pieces of evidence for your ideas from the readings; at least 1-2 statements of your own analysis of the readings; and at least 1-2 questions that you have identified as thought-provoking or interesting to you in the readings. If you are writing a seminar paper on one of the cases assigned for that week, please focus your response post on the other readings from the week. For this week’s post, consider the following questions, along with your own:First, read a few short cases to dive into the topic: Meinhard v. Salmon, Pierson v. Post, and Moore v. Regents of UCLA. Next, read Nudge, pages 31-73.1) What behavior is the court in Meinhard trying to incentivize?2) What is the “right of occupancy” in a wild animal, according to Pierson?3) What kinds of issues of duty and information does the Moore case raise?4) When do the authors of Nudge argue that people especially need “nudges”?
Requirements: .doc file | MLA | Discussion | 2 pages, Double spaced